Let's talk about dihonesty. I never said: "God did it for a mysterious purpose." It is dishonest to say I did.
Never said you did SAY it, other wise the phrase I
typed would have been in quotation marks. It wasn't. You see, this problem you have uderstanding rules of grammar and punctuation seem to keep following you around these threads and causing you confusion prompting mistatement.
No, it was my interpretation of your belief based on your self stated belief system. If my assessment is wrong or dishonest, are you now saying god DIDN'T
create man? And additionally that YOU DO KNOW WHY
it did create / or didn't ?
If,as I suspect based on observation of your repetative posts of childlike testamony, that your'e saying god DID
create mankind, and you still don't know WHY
, i.e. for what purpose, then by definition
it's a mystery
, and my assessment paraphrasing your belief is thus accurate. How is that a misrepresentation?
- So, what's Elman's postion today?
- How will he disprove the accuracy of my statement, tap dance around it? Or will he just realize his error and ignore the fact (again) that he's been exposed as unthinking and once again
underscore the original premise of this thread's subject line?
- Where is my dishonesty?
Is it true or not true that a study of these science books will result in finding no reason behind our existing? A science book is attempting to explain how we got here, not why
True. And when you accept that, you've taken the first step behind the "reason" for existence. Shit happens, and sometimes randomly. You're just part of the random shit. A part that fears and rejects reason.